Today, Philip Payne concludes his critique of Peter Head’s contention that the distigmai in Vaticanus “mark textual variation” and “belong to one unified system that was added some time in the 16th century.” To read the series in five parts, click below.
- Part 1: Introduction
- Part 2: Diple
- Part 3: Small Numbers, Large Numbers, and Other Marginalia
- Part 4: De Sepulveda
- Part 5: Identifying Later Distigmai and Conclusion
A composite PDF is forthcoming, as is Head’s revised argument that incorporates Payne’s critiques.