Eichhorn does not appear to have named Q as such, but this part of his hypothesis fits what has come to be called Q.
See Kümmel 77–79. Please see the symbol key for an explanation of the diagrams in this post series.
In this post:
Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
New Testament Interpretation
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.